Paul's right,
Robert Steve.
In the wake of the accident, Natalie has taken no official position on recumbents. I've followed the thread on the PBA site, where there has been some discussion of the crash, and there has been no further talk of specifically banning recumbents or mountain bikes from the Tweener ride. I tried to word my original post to say that the ride founder voiced her
wish (as in "preference") that recumbents not participate in her ride. She never forbade me to participate and, in fact, backpedaled pretty vigorously when she realized that she was discussing a possible recumbent ban
with the recumbent rider. Of course, there was no taking back her inclination toward doing so, and why would I force the issue by riding where I know I'm not welcome?
I guess the thing that chaps my hide is that the forum discussion has painted the incident as being the fault of some hotshot going off the front, pushing the pace, and pacelining on a ride where paceline riding is expressly prohibited. The
fact is that, at the time of the wreck, I was averaging around 6 feet behind the guy in front, and slightly to the right so I could see around him. We were rolling at between 16 and 18 mph, but it wasn't
consistent--hence my keeping a comfortable buffer.
As to the guy who ran up my back, I suppose the crash might have been my fault for not realizing that I had someone sucking my wheel, despite the fact that you can't draft a recumbent. On the forum, no names have been mentioned (not that anyone knows mine), and no one has pointed a finger at "that thingy on the recumbent", though it feels that way.
I admit my perceptions of all this are probably colored by the ride leader's comments and by those of at least one person on another forum (apparently we're sneaky and creep up on other riders without announcing our presence--something DF riders
never do). Maybe I just need to go ride with some people who aren't biased against me because of my bike and get my happy thoughts back.