Welcome, Guest. Please Login.
rbent - Recumbent Bike Enthusiasts of North Texas
May 2nd, 2024, 1:40am
News: Want to join the rbent Forum? See this thread.
Home Help Search Login


Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
shorter cranks (Read 2975 times)
FlyingLaZBoy
Moderator
*****


'16 ICE SprintX fs,
'16 Rocket, '12 KHS
Mocha

Posts: 5803
shorter cranks
Dec 13th, 2018, 1:49pm
 
I've switched the crankset on my SprintX from 170mm to 160mm, to reduce the max knee bend...  the first few rides feel pretty good with it, however, I think I'm feeling the ~6% reduction in torque when accelerating from a stop, or climbing a hill....
 
Interesting...
 
PB
Back to top
 
 

******************
"A hundred miles on a bike? How many
days does that take you?"

******************
Email FlyingLaZBoy   IP Logged
catroad254




rbent member

Posts: 239
Re: shorter cranks
Reply #1 - Dec 13th, 2018, 1:58pm
 
There is always a price to pay. The shorter cranks help with knee pain but you have to spin at higher rpms to compensate for the lower torque. It's worth it to me to have less pain- but I don't really care about speed.
Back to top
 
 
Email   IP Logged
jrob_bent
Five Star Member
*****


rbent member

Posts: 953
Re: shorter cranks
Reply #2 - Dec 17th, 2018, 11:40am
 
Aurelien Bonneteau used 123mm and 135 mm cranks during his hour record run and his 78.95 mph BM run. He is over 6'-2". Micah at Easy Street has adjustable cranks on his personal bike. Use an Allan wrench and slide the pedal up and down into whatever crank length you like.  
Back to top
 
 

I get about 15 miles per honey bun!
Email   IP Logged
diannalightning
Five Star Member
*****


rbent member

Posts: 522
Re: shorter cranks
Reply #3 - Dec 18th, 2018, 9:59am
 
Since Jay cut my cranks down on my VRex, I've not had knee pain on that bike.  I can't do high RPM's so I just use the large front chain ring more than I used to.  It's worth it to not have knee pain and to be able to ride.  At least that's what I tell myself.   Grin
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Phantom Rider
Five Star Member
*****




Posts: 1056
Re: shorter cranks
Reply #4 - Dec 20th, 2018, 10:24am
 
Short cRanks have made a huge difference for me.  I’m running 150’s on my Cruzbike V with a set of Q rings and my knee pain has been eliminated, I spin more and run 99% of time on the 52 big ring.  When I ride the trike a couple days in a row I certainly feel the difference as I have not yet made the change on it.
 
Back to top
 
 

2017 Cruzbike V20
2019 ICE VTX Black
SOLD - 2011 GT Karakorem 1.0 - 2012 Lightning Phantom II - 2004 Lightning P38 2013 Rans Rifle 2014 Catrike 700 - 2014 Bacchetta CA2
Email   IP Logged
jayg
Five Star Member
*****


rbent member

Posts: 4127
Re: shorter cranks
Reply #5 - Dec 20th, 2018, 11:24am
 
Quote from Phantom Rider on Dec 20th, 2018, 10:24am:
Short cRanks have made a huge difference for me.  I’m running 150’s on my Cruzbike V with a set of Q rings and my knee pain has been eliminated, I spin more and run 99% of time on the 52 big ring.  When I ride the trike a couple days in a row I certainly feel the difference as I have not yet made the change on it.


 
Joe, I switched to 150 mm cranks years ago. They eliminated my warm weather knee pain. I've always experienced stinging pain around my left patella, during cold weather. Have recently eliminated it by wearing a knee brace with chemical heating pads on both sides of the patella. Short cranks definitely work for people that have range of motion problems with their knees. I've installed chain rings with lower tooth counts on my bikes and trikes to compensate for the slight loss of torque experienced with shorter cranks. For example, I changed the 60T big ring on my GS Aero trike to a 53T. I ride mostly in that ring (trike has a 20" rear wheel).  
Back to top
 
 
Email   IP Logged
jrob_bent
Five Star Member
*****


rbent member

Posts: 953
Re: shorter cranks
Reply #6 - Dec 22nd, 2018, 7:41am
 
Rob Hague and Mark Mueller run 110mm cranks on their racing trikes. Rob told me this on FB and Ian mentioned it on his company page. That's close to 2 1/2" shorter than 170's.
Back to top
 
 

I get about 15 miles per honey bun!
Email   IP Logged
aikigreg
Moderator
*****


recumbent ninja

Posts: 3685
Re: shorter cranks
Reply #7 - Dec 24th, 2018, 3:53pm
 
I bet they ain't going up to many hills with those though.
Back to top
 
 

I'm in it to Schwinn it.
Email   IP Logged
jrob_bent
Five Star Member
*****


rbent member

Posts: 953
Re: shorter cranks
Reply #8 - Dec 24th, 2018, 4:08pm
 
I went from 172.5mm cranks to 150mm cranks and go up hills easier with the 150mm cranks. Phantom Rider Joe uses short cranks and it doesn't look like he has any problems with hills either. I'll let him tell his story though.
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Dec 24th, 2018, 4:09pm by jrob_bent »  

I get about 15 miles per honey bun!
Email   IP Logged
jrob_bent
Five Star Member
*****


rbent member

Posts: 953
Re: shorter cranks
Reply #9 - Dec 24th, 2018, 4:20pm
 
Studies have shown you don't lose power or use more oxygen with shorter cranks. https://bikefitadviser.com/crank-length-research/
Back to top
 
 

I get about 15 miles per honey bun!
Email   IP Logged
square_corners
Five Star Member
*****


rbent member

Posts: 2241
Re: shorter cranks
Reply #10 - Dec 26th, 2018, 7:56am
 
My velomobile has 155mm cranks. That is in part due to my long legs and lack of room for my shoes at the front end of the velo. My Bacchetta, Catrike 700, and road bikes have anything from 165 to 175 cranks and while I don't get knee pain with those, I can't say I feel any difference in power with the 155 cranks in the velo. I was very concerned when I ordered it that way but I can't tell any difference at all. I use the big ring 95% of the time - around here the hills aren't significant enough to require a change. The big ring is a 61. If I had a smaller big ring, it would be 99% of the time.
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Dec 26th, 2018, 7:59am by square_corners »  
Email   IP Logged
Bud_Bent
Moderator
*****




Posts: 3310
Re: shorter cranks
Reply #11 - Dec 30th, 2018, 5:06pm
 
I went to 165 mm cranks in the WAW, because of limited foot room inside. I've stayed with longer ones on everything else. Longer cranks require you to use a greater range of motion in your knees. I have to believe that helps me to retain more range of motion in my knees in my old age, and that is a good thing. So, as long as I don't get knee pain, I'm staying with the longer cranks.
Back to top
 
 

Bud
* 2009 RANS F-5 Pro
* 2009 RANS XStream
* 2004 RANS Screamer
My Blog - uneasy-rider.com
WWW   IP Logged
FlyingLaZBoy
Moderator
*****


'16 ICE SprintX fs,
'16 Rocket, '12 KHS
Mocha

Posts: 5803
Re: shorter cranks
Reply #12 - Jan 8th, 2019, 2:32pm
 
I'm starting to acclimate to the 160s on the trike, but I "feel" that I'm still climbing slower... other than that, it's all good.  I didn't ever HAVE any knee pain, it was more a preventive decision than anything else, since I've started to hear my knees crackling a bit climbing stairs at home.
 
I've still got 170s on the Rocket, which is on the trainer, so I may change that out, too.   If I do, I'll have at least one set of used FSA SK-light carbon cranks available to an interested party.
Back to top
 
 

******************
"A hundred miles on a bike? How many
days does that take you?"

******************
Email FlyingLaZBoy   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print